Departments



Articles

Less

Editorial: Myths, Misinformation and Propaganda
December 16th, 2008

Editorial: Editorial: Will Park Closure Just Make Things Worse?
November 29th, 2008

Editorial: Editorial: October and November Surprises
October 30th, 2008

Editorial: Is the Sky Falling?
September 24th, 2008

Editorial: Editorial: Who Reads Cedar Key News?
September 19th, 2008

Editorial: The First Hurdle for Every Child
September 3rd, 2008

Editorial: A View of China from Cedar Key
August 18th, 2008

Editorial: Who Killed the Real Estate Market?
August 8th, 2008

Editorial: Editorial: It`s Clamerica!
July 1st, 2008

Editorial: Can the City Commission Limit Noise?
June 6th, 2008

Editorial: Unintended Results Rock the Boat
May 29th, 2008

Editorial: Creeping Gas Prices
May 13th, 2008

Editorial: Cedar Key Election Soon
April 30th, 2008

Editorial: Questions fo the Candidates
April 2nd, 2008

Editorial: Coming Elections: National County and City
March 19th, 2008

More

Clam Poaching, are We Number One?

Clam Poaching, are We Number One?

Editorial

The legendary Hatfield-McCoy feud erupted over the theft of a single pig. The theft of clams from the off-shore clam leases has the potential for the violence of the Hatfield-McCoy feud. There is wide-spread belief in Cedar Key that certain individuals account for repeated clam thefts over the past four years. If conventional law enforcement does not stop clam poaching there is danger of vigilante retribution.


When there was surveillance on the clam leases by a private firm, poaching was limited if not nonexistent. However, freeloaders did not contribute to the cost of private security and the system broke down. Now clammers must rely on the government to enforce the law.


Poaching depresses the price wholesalers pay for clams. Poaching endangers the quality of clams reaching the market. Poaching can bankrupt honest clammers when they lose thousands of dollars worth of clams over night. Continued poaching destroys faith in the agencies charged with enforcing the law.


The failure to catch a single poacher may be the result of no single agency giving full attention to the poaching problem. The agency most clearly responsible is the Division of Agricultural Law Enforcement. It has promised to provide a boat for its investigator sometime after July1. That is more than a year and a half after assigning the investigator to Cedar Key. Reasons given by the Division of Agricultural Law Enforcement for failure are too numerous to list here, In August there will be a conference on aquatic law enforcement.


An inspector on the water, radar, bigger rewards, whatever! One arrest and conviction of a clam poacher would be a big step considering the years that nothing has been accomplished.

Click for printer friendly version

Email this article to a friend

 

 

© 2013
Cedar Key News

cedarkeynews@gmail.com