Departments



Articles

Less

Editorial: Endangered Species -- May We Ask Why?
May 2nd, 2007

Editorial: Editorial: a Free Press
April 21st, 2007

Editorial: Airboat Noise
April 7th, 2007

Editorial: Another Delay in Dock Repair
March 5th, 2007

Editorial: Are Some Technological Wonders Economically Impractical?
February 27th, 2007

Editorial: Editorial: Weakest Tax Link Examined
December 22nd, 2006

Editorial: A New Year`s Resolution -- For the Levy County Commission
December 10th, 2006

Editorial: Political Tides
November 17th, 2006

Editorial: Blue Pencil Needed on Levy County Budget
October 30th, 2006

Editorial: Fiscal Incompetence?
October 2nd, 2006

Editorial: Paddlers May Get Hit in Pocket
September 18th, 2006

Editorial: Time for Another Cedar Key Tea Party?
August 30th, 2006

Editorial: Automotive Turning Point
August 11th, 2006

Editorial: Are There Limits to Southern Hospitality?
July 24th, 2006

Editorial: Armadillos and Anthros
July 9th, 2006

More

Clam Poaching, are We Number One?

Clam Poaching, are We Number One?

Editorial

The legendary Hatfield-McCoy feud erupted over the theft of a single pig. The theft of clams from the off-shore clam leases has the potential for the violence of the Hatfield-McCoy feud. There is wide-spread belief in Cedar Key that certain individuals account for repeated clam thefts over the past four years. If conventional law enforcement does not stop clam poaching there is danger of vigilante retribution.


When there was surveillance on the clam leases by a private firm, poaching was limited if not nonexistent. However, freeloaders did not contribute to the cost of private security and the system broke down. Now clammers must rely on the government to enforce the law.


Poaching depresses the price wholesalers pay for clams. Poaching endangers the quality of clams reaching the market. Poaching can bankrupt honest clammers when they lose thousands of dollars worth of clams over night. Continued poaching destroys faith in the agencies charged with enforcing the law.


The failure to catch a single poacher may be the result of no single agency giving full attention to the poaching problem. The agency most clearly responsible is the Division of Agricultural Law Enforcement. It has promised to provide a boat for its investigator sometime after July1. That is more than a year and a half after assigning the investigator to Cedar Key. Reasons given by the Division of Agricultural Law Enforcement for failure are too numerous to list here, In August there will be a conference on aquatic law enforcement.


An inspector on the water, radar, bigger rewards, whatever! One arrest and conviction of a clam poacher would be a big step considering the years that nothing has been accomplished.

Click for printer friendly version

Email this article to a friend

 

 

© 2013
Cedar Key News

cedarkeynews@gmail.com