Departments



Articles

Less

Editorial: Endangered Species -- May We Ask Why?
May 2nd, 2007

Editorial: Editorial: a Free Press
April 21st, 2007

Editorial: Airboat Noise
April 7th, 2007

Editorial: Another Delay in Dock Repair
March 5th, 2007

Editorial: Are Some Technological Wonders Economically Impractical?
February 27th, 2007

Editorial: Editorial: Weakest Tax Link Examined
December 22nd, 2006

Editorial: A New Year`s Resolution -- For the Levy County Commission
December 10th, 2006

Editorial: Political Tides
November 17th, 2006

Editorial: Blue Pencil Needed on Levy County Budget
October 30th, 2006

Editorial: Fiscal Incompetence?
October 2nd, 2006

Editorial: Paddlers May Get Hit in Pocket
September 18th, 2006

Editorial: Time for Another Cedar Key Tea Party?
August 30th, 2006

Editorial: Automotive Turning Point
August 11th, 2006

Editorial: Are There Limits to Southern Hospitality?
July 24th, 2006

Editorial: Armadillos and Anthros
July 9th, 2006

More

Moratorium Battle Heats Up

Moratorium Battle Heats Up

Editorial

Moratorium: Any authorized delay or stopping of some specified activity.


Gaining support from opinions expressed at the public Comprehensive Plan revision meeting, the concept of limiting certain types of building construction has resulted in a draft temporary limited building moratorium. The Cedar Key Commission has advertised a moratorium ordinance that, if passed after two readings in September, would prevent action on variance requests and several other specified building actions for six months.


The ordinance, drafted by City Attorney David Coffey, originally was for twelve months, and has been described as a legal means of giving time to address a problem while avoiding action. After extensive debate by the Commission, the length of the moratorium was reduced to six months and a provision for exemption of certain historic buildings and areas was added.


Proponents of the moratorium wish to avoid a "land rush" of variance requests in advance of feared possible changes in the Comprehensive Plan. They want time for judicious revision of the Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Regulations. Ultimately, limitation of multi unit attached housing (condominium) development and rapid change of Cedar Key is sought.


Opponents of the moratorium say it is not needed. They add that the Commission should do its job and deal with each request for change on a case-by-case basis. The moratorium is said to harm those who have invested with plans to develop property. Opponents feel that the moratorium will give Cedar Key a reputation for being against business and development.


Political reality is that the moratorium will probably pass. Legal reality is that a moratorium, if limited and specific, will stand up in court. The Commission and its advisory body the Local Planning Agency jumped through all the required legal hoops. The short period of the moratorium suggests that it would expire before winding through court challenges.


Although not everyone is happy with the moratorium in its present form, the democratic process grinds on. No blood was shed. With luck, and political foresight by the Commission, the six month moratorium will be history in six months and those who have predicted an extension will be pleased and surprised.

Click for printer friendly version

Email this article to a friend

 

 

© 2013
Cedar Key News

cedarkeynews@gmail.com