Cedar Key News: Accuracy in Reporting Needed

email: cedarkeynews@gmail.com Phone: 352-543-6970
"News, of the people, by the people, for the people."

Articles

Less

Letters to the Editor: Alas Buddy
August 26th, 2004

Letters to the Editor: No Gulf Trail
August 26th, 2004

Letters to the Editor: Responsibilities of a Public Figure
August 14th, 2004

Letters to the Editor: Great Storm Coverage!
August 14th, 2004

Letters to the Editor: Thank You to the Firefighters of Levy County
August 5th, 2004

Letters to the Editor: Getting Rid of Old Computers
July 28th, 2004

Letters to the Editor: Great Celebration!
July 9th, 2004

Letters to the Editor: Business Card Request Letter a Hoax?
June 21st, 2004

Letters to the Editor: Thank You Cedar Key!
June 12th, 2004

Letters to the Editor: Request for Election Information
June 9th, 2004

Letters to the Editor: Military Study Highlights Negative Impact of Bombing Range
May 29th, 2004

Letters to the Editor: A BIG LOSS
May 24th, 2004

Letters to the Editor: Cedar Key Cedar Where?
May 17th, 2004

Letters to the Editor: Lost Cat Found
May 14th, 2004

Letters to the Editor: Farewell and Thank You!
May 10th, 2004

More

Accuracy in Reporting Needed

Letters to the Editor

Dear Editor,

It is very important to preserve the integrity of your newspaper that corrections be reported when you print fact errors. I am disappointed that you did not at least publish my letter to the editor last week regarding the fact errors in the "Informed Voters Wanted" editorial.

I don`t think that just printing the Charrette report in its entirety solves the problem. Both the incorrect article and date of publishing need to be referenced, along with the corrected information. Perhaps the Cedar Key News needs an ongoing corrections column, as the articles remain available online for such a long period of time, and will continue to mislead the public. It is imperative that the information
you print as news is truth. Maybe providing a byline for every article would help make the reporting reliable, as someone would become accountable for their accuracy.

In this week`s edition, the City Commission Meeting Summary reports that the Commission unanimously approved a proposal to submit application for a Community Development Block Grant. This information is also incorrect. The Commission`s vote was actually four in favor and one against. This error may be unimportant to the paper, however, it is important to me. Several citizens asked that I not support another grant proposal right now, and I tried to represent their wishes. Your inaccurate report makes it seem as if I ignored their requests. Please correct this challenge the paper is encountering, or lose the trust of the community.

Thanks,
Vanessa Edmunds

Editors Note: We at Cedar Key News regret our error in reporting that Commissioner Edmunds voted for, rather than against the motion in question. At Commissioner Edmunds` suggestion, we are instituting a "Corrections Button" that should facilitate finding whatever corrections that are needed in the future.

Click for printer friendly version

Email this article to a friend