Departments



Articles

Less

Letters to the Editor: Alas Buddy
August 26th, 2004

Letters to the Editor: No Gulf Trail
August 26th, 2004

Letters to the Editor: Responsibilities of a Public Figure
August 14th, 2004

Letters to the Editor: Great Storm Coverage!
August 14th, 2004

Letters to the Editor: Thank You to the Firefighters of Levy County
August 5th, 2004

Letters to the Editor: Getting Rid of Old Computers
July 28th, 2004

Letters to the Editor: Great Celebration!
July 9th, 2004

Letters to the Editor: Business Card Request Letter a Hoax?
June 21st, 2004

Letters to the Editor: Thank You Cedar Key!
June 12th, 2004

Letters to the Editor: Request for Election Information
June 9th, 2004

Letters to the Editor: Military Study Highlights Negative Impact of Bombing Range
May 29th, 2004

Letters to the Editor: A BIG LOSS
May 24th, 2004

Letters to the Editor: Cedar Key Cedar Where?
May 17th, 2004

Letters to the Editor: Lost Cat Found
May 14th, 2004

Letters to the Editor: Farewell and Thank You!
May 10th, 2004

More

Letter to the Editor

Letter to the Editor

Disguised Commercial Development in Residential Areas

Dear Editor:

We urge you to attend the Quasi-Judicial Hearing by the City Commissioners acting in their capacity as the local Planning Agency scheduled for November 12, 2003 and express your opposition against the proposed eight-unit apartment structure submitted in Petition No. 2002-13 by Applicant, Walter White.

We have two specific concerns about this project, and we hope that other members of the community agree with us. First, it is our opinion that a single structure of the size proposed by Walter White is not compatible with the nature of the existing neighborhood. Second,we fear that the applicant`s proposal for construction of a residential apartment complex is actually a commercial project proposed for development within a residential zone.

Cedar Key¹s residential zones are under constant pressure by developers of lodging projects. First came the Fenimore Mill project, then it was Whitman Point Townhouses, then Seahorse Landing, and most recently, Nature¹s Landing. All of these projects have been built in residential zones. These
projects are essentially commercial lodging developments permitted, built and sold as residential condominiums within residential zoning districts. As soon as the construction was completed, the new owners obtained rental managers, secured business licenses from the state and city and converted the use of the residential dwelling units into day, week and monthly lodging facilities.

In order to prevent this continued charade, the City Commissioners should institute a policy of insuring that commercial development projects remain concentrated in the areas of the city which are zoned commercial and make
every effort to guarantee that projects which are proposed for development in the residential zones of the city remain residential in character and use. This can be accomplished by placing deed restrictions on projects proposed to be built in residential districts. Deed restrictions will pass with the property from one owner to the next. If an owner wishes to use their property for a use which is not allowed within the specific zone, then the property owner still has the right to request that the City Commissioners change the zoning district or seek a conditional use permit for a non-conforming use of his property.

If the City Commissioners continue to allow commercial lodging developments disguised as residential housing units to encroach into the city¹s shrinking residential neighborhoods, soon, the very character of the island will disappear. Please take the long overdue step to insure that we do not lose the charm of historic Cedar Key by advocating to the City Commissioners that they deny Walter White¹s Petition for Development Review, Petition No.2002-13 on November 12, 2002.

Sincerely,

Jeff Dwyer & Elizabeth O`Grady

Click for printer friendly version

Email this article to a friend

 

 

© 2013
Cedar Key News

cedarkeynews@gmail.com