Departments



Articles

Less

Letters to the Editor: Another Letter to the Editor
April 28th, 2009

Letters to the Editor: Alison Weir`s Response to Mike Segal
April 21st, 2009

Letters to the Editor: Reply to an Advertisement in Cedar Key News
April 20th, 2009

Letters to the Editor: Another Letter to the Editor
April 20th, 2009

Letters to the Editor: Action from Tallahassee?
February 27th, 2009

Letters to the Editor: Message from Fr. Jim Wright
February 25th, 2009

Letters to the Editor: Letter: Tarmac Questions
January 25th, 2009

Letters to the Editor: County`s Potential Appointments Raise Questions
January 10th, 2009

Letters to the Editor: Letter: Please Help Keep Our Parks Open
December 24th, 2008

Letters to the Editor: Letter: Thanks From Stephanie Gazda
December 6th, 2008

Letters to the Editor: Chamber Urges Action to Keep State Museum Open
November 29th, 2008

Letters to the Editor: Letter: Consider More Than Jobs
November 8th, 2008

Letters to the Editor: Letter: Former Resident Reacts to Commission Indictments
November 7th, 2008

Letters to the Editor: Letter: Blatant Racism Offends Visitors
November 7th, 2008

Letters to the Editor: Canadian Enjoys CK News
September 22nd, 2008

More

Response To The Chamber

Response To The Chamber

Margy Vanlandingham

To the Editor:

Permit me to comment on the recent letter from the Chamber of Commerce vis-a-vis my campaign statement urging the City of Cedar Key to stop the Chamber subsidy. My thinking was as follows: the City bought the Creswell House in 2008 for $330,000, and renovated it in 2010 for use as a Welcome Center at a cost of $67,807. The City`s investment was thus $397,807. If the occupants of the building, the Chamber of Commerce, were to have bought the building and renovated it, and had taken out a mortgage for $400,000 at terms of 5% per year for 30 years, the mortgage payments would have been $2148 per month. Instead, the Chamber negotiated a lease with the City to rent the building for $150 per month. That represents a $2000 per month or $24,000 per year subsidy.

My position was and still is: in a tight fiscal situation which the City certainly appears to be in, that magnitude of a subsidy seems inappropriate. I did not say the Chamber isn`t spending any of their own money on the Center or that the City shouldn`t be partnering with the Chamber (although I do see a qualitative difference with the other non-profit organizations mentioned as partners). What I do believe is that the subsidy is way too large, and that the entire business community can do better than $150 per month. End of my story, and thank you for the opportunity to respond.

Click for printer friendly version

Email this article to a friend

 

 

© 2013
Cedar Key News

cedarkeynews@gmail.com