Departments



Articles

Less

Editorial: What Have We Learned?
September 3rd, 2005

Editorial: Speak Now or Forever Hold Your Peace
August 17th, 2005

Editorial: What Is a Consultant to Do?
July 5th, 2005

Editorial: Six Land Use Petitions in Play
June 25th, 2005

Editorial: Poaching & Plagiarism
June 13th, 2005

Editorial: Upward and Onward in 2005
May 24th, 2005

Editorial: Farewell Maureen
May 17th, 2005

Editorial: Speaking About Speak Out
May 10th, 2005

Editorial: Informed Voters Wanted
March 26th, 2005

Editorial: Health Needs Survey Well Received
February 12th, 2005

Editorial: Fire Protection, Fire Insurance and Tax Justice
January 25th, 2005

Editorial: Cedar Key Health Service Survey
January 14th, 2005

Editorial: New Year`s Resolution
December 31st, 2004

Editorial: Do We Need Better Healthcare in Cedar Key?
December 16th, 2004

Editorial: Help Defend Us
October 29th, 2004

More

Moratorium Battle Heats Up

Moratorium Battle Heats Up

Editorial

Moratorium: Any authorized delay or stopping of some specified activity.


Gaining support from opinions expressed at the public Comprehensive Plan revision meeting, the concept of limiting certain types of building construction has resulted in a draft temporary limited building moratorium. The Cedar Key Commission has advertised a moratorium ordinance that, if passed after two readings in September, would prevent action on variance requests and several other specified building actions for six months.


The ordinance, drafted by City Attorney David Coffey, originally was for twelve months, and has been described as a legal means of giving time to address a problem while avoiding action. After extensive debate by the Commission, the length of the moratorium was reduced to six months and a provision for exemption of certain historic buildings and areas was added.


Proponents of the moratorium wish to avoid a "land rush" of variance requests in advance of feared possible changes in the Comprehensive Plan. They want time for judicious revision of the Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Regulations. Ultimately, limitation of multi unit attached housing (condominium) development and rapid change of Cedar Key is sought.


Opponents of the moratorium say it is not needed. They add that the Commission should do its job and deal with each request for change on a case-by-case basis. The moratorium is said to harm those who have invested with plans to develop property. Opponents feel that the moratorium will give Cedar Key a reputation for being against business and development.


Political reality is that the moratorium will probably pass. Legal reality is that a moratorium, if limited and specific, will stand up in court. The Commission and its advisory body the Local Planning Agency jumped through all the required legal hoops. The short period of the moratorium suggests that it would expire before winding through court challenges.


Although not everyone is happy with the moratorium in its present form, the democratic process grinds on. No blood was shed. With luck, and political foresight by the Commission, the six month moratorium will be history in six months and those who have predicted an extension will be pleased and surprised.

Click for printer friendly version

Email this article to a friend

 

 

© 2013
Cedar Key News

cedarkeynews@gmail.com