Departments



Articles

Less

Letters to the Editor: Is this How Busch Supports our Military?
March 24th, 2003

Letters to the Editor: Letter to the Editor
January 11th, 2003

Letters to the Editor: Letter to the Editor
January 10th, 2003

Letters to the Editor: Letter to the Editor - Support Your Local Police
December 11th, 2002

Letters to the Editor: Letter to the Editor
November 4th, 2002

Letters to the Editor: Letters to the Editor
October 15th, 2002

Letters to the Editor: Jack Gargan Responds
August 6th, 2002

Letters to the Editor: Letter To The Editor:
July 19th, 2002

Letters to the Editor: Remembering Frank Small
July 18th, 2002

Letters to the Editor: Letter to the Editor
June 14th, 2002

Letters to the Editor: Letters to the Editor
June 5th, 2002

Letters to the Editor: What a Treat!
May 27th, 2002

Letters to the Editor: Letters to the Editor
May 25th, 2002

Letters to the Editor: Cemetary Point Beach Trash
May 22nd, 2002

Letters to the Editor: Letter to The Editor
May 13th, 2002

More

Some Thoughts

Some Thoughts

Letters to the Editor

For Cedar Key News


The liberal publication, The Nation, clears its skirts in the 1/26/04 issue of comments by its columnist Alexander Cockburn who apparently made some Bush/Hitler comparisons. It disavows such a comparison for itself.


However, it put me to thinking of topics which I must have read decades ago, dealing with the rise of Hitler in the 1930s. (Yes, I`ve even read Mein Kampf, an unexpurgated version published by American Jews in the 1930s, the better to expose Hitler`s anti-Semitism).


It was bad times in Germany, remember. In the 1920s inflation had been so bad that it took wheelbarrows of paper money to buy a week`s groceries. Anybody who claimed to be a savior looked good. Along came this electrifying orator who, it turned out, had a hard core following and was willing to slay his opponents. But his rise would have been impossible without the endorsement/support/aid/coooperation of business and industry. The really big boys. Here, we are talking Siemens, Volkswagen, Bayer, steel, munitions. The major message: The so-called Nazi structure was largely an amalgamation of corporate and government power. An unhealthy partnership, one feeding on the other until it settled on a mandate of expansion for its continued survival.


Looking back on it, perhaps this is what Dwight Eisenhower had in mind during his swan song, when he warned of the "military-industrial complex."


Question: Does not George Bush`s hand-in-glove relationship with major corporations and their key figures, his financing by them, his key appointments of them, his tax policy, his deregulation policy, his protection of them (environment, Enron, utilities), his privatization of government functions, his generous contracting with them, all coupled with his heavy reliance on the Pentagon arm, is there not a parallel between Germany of the 1930s and the U.S.A. of the year 2000?


This concept is not just about Ashcroft-type extremism, or the shallow comparison of Bush with Hitler. It is not just about an upcoming election. Indeed, the process may be in initial stages. It suggests a complete reworking of American society and thought-processes for the indeterminable future. It suggests a corporate-run society which, coupled with the military, will demand expansion for its own well-being.


It will not require a Hitler. It requires only process.


Buddy Davis

Click for printer friendly version

Email this article to a friend

 

 

© 2013
Cedar Key News

cedarkeynews@gmail.com