Departments



Articles

Less

Letters to the Editor: Complacency or Vigilance?
September 21st, 2008

Letters to the Editor: Freedom to Read is Basic
September 20th, 2008

Letters to the Editor: Lutterloh Fund Grows
June 15th, 2008

Letters to the Editor: Airport Safety
June 12th, 2008

Letters to the Editor: Letter Praises McCain
May 26th, 2008

Letters to the Editor: Grandma`s Boys
May 25th, 2008

Letters to the Editor: Letter to the Editor
May 24th, 2008

Letters to the Editor: Letter to the Editor
May 21st, 2008

Letters to the Editor: Thank You from Vanessa Edmunds
March 19th, 2008

Letters to the Editor: Thank You Note
March 16th, 2008

Letters to the Editor: Historic Preservation, Individual Property Rights and Public Policy
February 4th, 2008

Letters to the Editor: Response to Comp Plan Workshop
February 1st, 2008

Letters to the Editor: Thank You Note
January 30th, 2008

Letters to the Editor: Cedar Key Snow Angel Visits Montana
January 2nd, 2008

Letters to the Editor: "Letter to the Editor"
September 12th, 2007

More

Letter: Study Merger of Water & Sewer District into City

Letter: Study Merger of Water & Sewer District into City

Letters to the Editor

(Editor`s note: the following was included in a memo sent to the Cedar Key City Commission by local resident Jeff Dwyer.)


Feasibility Study to Evaluate a Merger of the Cedar Key Water & Sewer District into the City of Cedar Key



During the planning process for updating the City`s Comprehensive Plan and customizing the initial generic CRA documents so the two documents would meet the future needs of Cedar Key, the consultants from Civic Design Associates recommended that long range planning for the community should include the eventual merger of the Water District into the City - possibly as part of the City`s Public Works department. Because the District`s service area has been reduced and now closely overlays the City boundaries, many taxpayers and voters feel that it is wise to explore the pros and cons of a merger. We feel that a feasibility study should be done to determine if the merger should occur and if so, how it would be accomplished.


Next week, I`m asking the CK Water & Sewer District Commissions to initiate a Request for Proposal (RFP) for the feasibility study. The Water District`s general manager, Jack Hotaling asked me to approach the City Commission to determine the Commissioner`s opinions and begin a discussion. Because the Water District`s financial resources are severely restricted because of a number of infrastructure improvements. I`d like to take Jack`s request a bit further. I`d like the City Commission to support the feasibility study and offer to pay the cost of it using CRA funds.


Assuming that such as feasibility study concluded that it would be in the best interests of the taxpayers and the customers of the Water District to merge the District into the City, Florida laws regulating "Special Districts" governs this transaction. In order to dissolve a "special district," a unanimous vote of all members of the CKWSD Board of Directors would be required before the State legislature could act upon a dissolution request. To dissolve the CKWSD, transfer its assets and liabilities to the City and hire its employees as part of a new City Public Works department would require an affirmative vote from all five Water Board Commissioners and an affirmative vote from a majority of the Cedar Key City Commissioners.


The feasibility study may conclude that it isn`t wise to eliminate the Water District even though presently, there exists a duplication of many expenses that could be eliminated by merging the District into the City. Because the City`s and the District`s taxpayers have seen a large increase in their property taxes, many of us believe that the Commissioners from both governmental bodies should investigate every opportunity to reduce the cost of operating and thus reduce the. property taxes and water and sewer rates for the taxpayers. These are but a few issues a feasibility study would investigate. Then the findings could be presented to the voters for discussion and debate.


Please consider this request as a positive attempt to streamline the costs and operations of the Water District and the City`s existing public works department and allow the implementation of critical infrastructure to occur as economically as possible. Please vote to support an RFP. Then in conjunction with the Water Board Commissioners, evaluated the proposals, select one, and use CRA funds to pay the cost of the feasibility study. Such an action would continue a critical part of the long range planning that was recommended to us in 2003.

Click for printer friendly version

Email this article to a friend

 

 

© 2013
Cedar Key News

cedarkeynews@gmail.com