Departments



Articles

Less

Letters to the Editor: Complacency or Vigilance?
September 21st, 2008

Letters to the Editor: Freedom to Read is Basic
September 20th, 2008

Letters to the Editor: Lutterloh Fund Grows
June 15th, 2008

Letters to the Editor: Airport Safety
June 12th, 2008

Letters to the Editor: Letter Praises McCain
May 26th, 2008

Letters to the Editor: Grandma`s Boys
May 25th, 2008

Letters to the Editor: Letter to the Editor
May 24th, 2008

Letters to the Editor: Letter to the Editor
May 21st, 2008

Letters to the Editor: Thank You from Vanessa Edmunds
March 19th, 2008

Letters to the Editor: Thank You Note
March 16th, 2008

Letters to the Editor: Historic Preservation, Individual Property Rights and Public Policy
February 4th, 2008

Letters to the Editor: Response to Comp Plan Workshop
February 1st, 2008

Letters to the Editor: Thank You Note
January 30th, 2008

Letters to the Editor: Cedar Key Snow Angel Visits Montana
January 2nd, 2008

Letters to the Editor: "Letter to the Editor"
September 12th, 2007

More

Letter To Editor

Letter To Editor

Scott Dennison

Recently as a Cedar Key CRA/Commission member (CK/CRA) I voted against the funding of repairs requested by the Cedar Key Water & Sewer District (CKWSD).

At the request of our taxpayers and local newspapers (who require brevity) I stated my opposition in 3 simple sentences. This has led to verbal and written assaults by the CKWSD Board to suppress questions. This was their similar reaction when Cedar Key citizens requested they reduce the trihalomethanes (TTHMs) in our water supply.

The CKWSD was created by the Florida legislature 30+ years ago with the specific legal obligation to maintain, repair, and operate the Cedar Key water & sewer system which is leased to them by the taxpayers of Cedar Key.

Let me first assure the Cedar Key taxpayers the CK/CRA members and myself, by all my past votes, have agreed to help fund the CKWSD in our joint efforts as community partners. I have voted for and supported the use of $1.6M+ CK/CRA tax dollars to repair and upgrade the system.

What I was shocked at was the demand to yet fund again additional repairs in less than 2 weeks after the completed Utilities Projects were accepted by the CKWSD. Yes the repairs needed to be made, but why cannot the CKWSD fund the repairs themselves? Are there more "excluded" pipes? Does the CKWSD board not have the funds?

The CKWSD did utilize the resources of accountants, consultants, and industry experts to rationalize their property tax and utilities rate structure. Yes the CKWSD is unique in also assessing a property tax.

But based upon the phone calls I have received about the CKWSD rates and new meters, the question must be asked - but can Cedar Key families and businesses afford it?

Scott Dennison
City of Cedar Key
Commissioner - Seat 2

Click for printer friendly version

Email this article to a friend

 

 

© 2013
Cedar Key News

cedarkeynews@gmail.com