Departments



Articles

Less

Letters to the Editor: Letter to the Editor: Eagles` Membership Deserves Explanation
November 23rd, 2010

Letters to the Editor: Letter to the Editor: Thanks From Lions Club
November 16th, 2010

Letters to the Editor: Letter to the Editor: Carefully Consider Changes to Redfish Limits
October 21st, 2010

Letters to the Editor: Letter to the Editor: Cedar Key is Alive and Well
October 4th, 2010

Letters to the Editor: Letter: Accolades
August 6th, 2010

Letters to the Editor: Letter to the Editor: Bully in the Neighborhood
July 11th, 2010

Letters to the Editor: Dennison Expresses Thanks for Fireworks
July 7th, 2010

Letters to the Editor: Letter: Answers to Letter
June 3rd, 2010

Letters to the Editor: Letter to the Editor: Funds, Opinions Sought for Fireworks Display
May 31st, 2010

Letters to the Editor: Letter: Do the Math
May 30th, 2010

Letters to the Editor: Letter to the Editor: Losing Respect for Law
May 28th, 2010

Letters to the Editor: "Thank You" From Scott Dennison
May 27th, 2010

Letters to the Editor: Arts Show Plans
April 16th, 2010

Letters to the Editor: Letter to the Editor
March 13th, 2010

Letters to the Editor: Letter to the Editor: Representative Government
February 26th, 2010

More

Response To The Chamber

Response To The Chamber

Margy Vanlandingham

To the Editor:

Permit me to comment on the recent letter from the Chamber of Commerce vis-a-vis my campaign statement urging the City of Cedar Key to stop the Chamber subsidy. My thinking was as follows: the City bought the Creswell House in 2008 for $330,000, and renovated it in 2010 for use as a Welcome Center at a cost of $67,807. The City`s investment was thus $397,807. If the occupants of the building, the Chamber of Commerce, were to have bought the building and renovated it, and had taken out a mortgage for $400,000 at terms of 5% per year for 30 years, the mortgage payments would have been $2148 per month. Instead, the Chamber negotiated a lease with the City to rent the building for $150 per month. That represents a $2000 per month or $24,000 per year subsidy.

My position was and still is: in a tight fiscal situation which the City certainly appears to be in, that magnitude of a subsidy seems inappropriate. I did not say the Chamber isn`t spending any of their own money on the Center or that the City shouldn`t be partnering with the Chamber (although I do see a qualitative difference with the other non-profit organizations mentioned as partners). What I do believe is that the subsidy is way too large, and that the entire business community can do better than $150 per month. End of my story, and thank you for the opportunity to respond.

Click for printer friendly version

Email this article to a friend

 

 

© 2013
Cedar Key News

cedarkeynews@gmail.com