Departments



Articles

Less

Letters to the Editor: Solid Waste Solutions
February 8th, 2010

Letters to the Editor: Letter to the Editor from Bill Betts
January 12th, 2010

Letters to the Editor: Letter: Recycling Trailer Update
January 9th, 2010

Letters to the Editor: Letter to the Editor: Comments About Restaurant
November 19th, 2009

Letters to the Editor: Letters: Lest We Forget
November 1st, 2009

Letters to the Editor: Letters: Concern Over Business Name
October 31st, 2009

Letters to the Editor: Restore Music in Cedar Key
October 6th, 2009

Letters to the Editor: Cedar Key Visit
October 1st, 2009

Letters to the Editor: Letter: A Glimpse Into the Past
August 22nd, 2009

Letters to the Editor: Cost of Solar Panels Questioned
July 19th, 2009

Letters to the Editor: Letter: Budget Process Needs Citizen Input
July 6th, 2009

Letters to the Editor: Regarding the Hodgson Avenue Brush Fire
June 14th, 2009

Letters to the Editor: Rescued in Gulf - Thank You
June 4th, 2009

Letters to the Editor: Thank You, Cedar Key
May 24th, 2009

Letters to the Editor: Missing Joel and Dick
May 22nd, 2009

More

Letter To Editor

Letter To Editor

Margy Vanlandingham

I would like to say thank you to the many people who were so helpful and supportive in my recent campaign for City Commission here in Cedar Key, prominently my campaign workers and those who voted for me, but also a thank you to all of the folks who just voted. And yes, I lost by 117 votes, but let that not be interpreted as some landslide victory for the loyal opposition. Had only 59 of those 117 voters cast their ballot for me instead of the incumbant, the final tally would have been VanLandingham 141, Dennison 140. Also, it is important to understand that we have 588 registered voters in the City, and that 59 swing votes represents only 10% of the electorate. We should not allow 59 votes or 10% of the voters to unilaterally decide on the future of our city. Finally on numbers, Mister Dennison did garner 71% of those votes cast, but since only about 50% of the voters showed up, he won only about 35% of the possible votes. Again, be clear on how much weight we should place on the detailed numbers here, when half of the voters stayed home.

But on to the future because that is where we need to focus our attention now. Mr. Dennison and I absolutely agree on one important point: people need to become more involved in the governance of their city if the true will of the people is to be observed.

The 5 City Commissioners are not mind readers, they need voter input and suggestions, but the question is how to do that. I can tell you from running many hundreds of meetings during my career, the answer is not to simply have the Commission chastize the audience for not showing up.


Many of the current City Commission meetings are announced on short notice, with agenda titles so general as to not give a hint about what the true intent of the item is, with virtually no explanatory details provided to the audience, and mind-numbing insider talk that goes on for hours. An average citizen will show up for one or two of these things, and go away forever because it is obvious that their input is not really welcome. The Commission needs to take this issue in hand by providing the initiative to improve the participation level and the understanding level of the citizenry, not the other way around.


It is called leadership. That`s why we elect you. And if the initiative is pursued vigorously enough and is successful, you will not have a MAJOR road project approved like that at the January 17, 2012, meeting, with only 3 or 4 people in the general audience. Thanks for listening, and oh by the way, I was discussing different points of view on issues, not dividing sectors. That`s was this campaign was all about, and that`s the View from VanLandingham.

Click for printer friendly version

Email this article to a friend

 

 

© 2013
Cedar Key News

cedarkeynews@gmail.com