Articles | Less
News: Garbage Removal Fees Go Up February 21st, 2008
News: Horse-drawn Carriage Must Keep Moving February 20th, 2008
News: Public Speaking for Youths February 18th, 2008
News: Planned Housing Density "Defined" February 15th, 2008
News: Building Department Hires New Code Enforcement Officer February 12th, 2008
News: Dog Grooming Made Easy February 11th, 2008
News: Big Dock Update February 5 February 5th, 2008
News: Draft Comp Plan Draws Critics` Pleas February 2nd, 2008
News: Obama and McCain Win in Cedar Key January 30th, 2008
News: Lions Give $$$$$ For Playground January 25th, 2008
News: Commission Makes Quick Work of Agenda January 9th, 2008
News: Historic Wood Reclaimed by Local Furniture Manufacturer January 6th, 2008
News: Drilling for Pilings Starts / Contest Entry Forms December 18th, 2007
News: Police Report December 13 December 13th, 2007
News: $9,200,000 Bond Issue Approved December 5th, 2007
More
|
|
|
City Commission Acts on Four Ordinances | City Commission Acts on Four OrdinancesJim Hoy The Cedar Key Commission passed four ordinances at its June 12 meeting. An ordinance that clarifies land use on a lot at the end of Anna Street owned by Ross and Dawn Buck reclassified the lot from conservation land to low density residential classification. The ordinance passed unanimously on its final reading. On first reading, an ordinance restricting overnight recreational vehicle parking passed unanimously, with the comment that the Police Department will now be able to issue $250 tickets to violators. Likewise, an ordinance passed unanimously that requires candidates for Commission seats to pay a $48 fee, which is equal to one percent of the annual salary of a Commission member. Also, an ordinance passed unanimously that will allow annexation into the City of a property owned by Walt McJordan, with the expected clarification of limited subdivision of the property on second reading. In other business, Jeff Davis of the Levy County School District made an informational presentation regarding plans to require land developers to pay the cost of school construction based on anticipated increases in school aged population associated with the development. The School District desires statement of support from affected municipalities. |
|
|
|
|