Departments



Articles

Less

Letters to the Editor: Best Friends for Life
December 12th, 2003

Letters to the Editor: Merry Christmas Cedar Key
December 8th, 2003

Letters to the Editor: Go GW Go!
November 29th, 2003

Letters to the Editor: How Can You Tell It`s Hunting Season?
October 17th, 2003

Letters to the Editor: Fishing in Cedar Key
October 16th, 2003

Letters to the Editor: Medically Needy Program Changes
June 25th, 2003

Letters to the Editor: Support Your Local Police
May 30th, 2003

Letters to the Editor: County Budget Questions
May 27th, 2003

Letters to the Editor: Good Publishing!
May 12th, 2003

Letters to the Editor: Toxic Dumping in Gulf Waters
May 11th, 2003

Letters to the Editor: Tribute for Our Hometown Hero
May 7th, 2003

Letters to the Editor: An Election Opinion
May 1st, 2003

Letters to the Editor: Historic Event in Cedar Key
April 19th, 2003

Letters to the Editor: Marines Call with Words of Sympathy
April 2nd, 2003

Letters to the Editor: With Deepest Sympathy
March 28th, 2003

More

Another View of the Pulp Mill Pipeline

Another View of the Pulp Mill Pipeline

Letters to the Editor

November 14, 2005

Cedar Key News

Dear Editor:

Howard Drew from Buckeye Technologies has argued that their plan for improving Fenholloway water quality will be benefical to the coastal ocean environment, by reducing pollutants (especially water color and nutrients) that have historically caused problems like seagrass dieoffs off the Fenholloway mouth. Part of that plan is a pipeline that would carry their effluent to the Fenholloway estuary, bypassing about 23 miles of the river. Concern has been raised that by dumping into the estuary rather than into the river upstream, the polluted water might reach the ocean in greater amounts or higher concentrations.

Mr. Drew is right in his claim that the main pollutants of concern to us here in Cedar Key (color, nutrients) will not be increased through transport of them by pipeline rather than the Fenholloway River channel. Those pollutants are not significantly reduced or permanently stored by being passed along such a short river, so it really does not matter to amounts reaching the estuary whether those amounts get there through a pipeline or a river channel. It is Buckeye's treatment improvements at source that will make the difference, not how the remaining pollution gets moved to the ocean. A few things like biochemical oxygen demand may be a bit higher in the estuary than they would if there were no pipeline, but those things are not ones that should directly concern people here.

Cleaning up the Fenholloway could create some great riverfront land development opportunities for Buckeye, and you might wonder whether a polluter ought to be allowed to benefit that way from investments in cleanup, but we really do not have good grounds for complaining that they are going to make matters worse in the coastal environment.

Carl Walters

Professor of Fisheries

University of British Columbia

(and Cedar Key winter resident

Click for printer friendly version

Email this article to a friend

 

 

© 2013
Cedar Key News

cedarkeynews@gmail.com