Departments



Articles

Less

Letters to the Editor: Questions for the Fishing News
May 9th, 2004

Letters to the Editor: Local Girl Shines at State Meet
May 7th, 2004

Letters to the Editor: A Piece of Cedar Key History Up for Auction
April 25th, 2004

Letters to the Editor: Levy County Bombing Range
April 25th, 2004

Letters to the Editor: USS ISLE ROYALE AD29 Reunion
April 25th, 2004

Letters to the Editor: Ms Kitty Needs a Home
April 15th, 2004

Letters to the Editor: A Trip Down Memory Lane
March 24th, 2004

Letters to the Editor: Changing Parties
March 19th, 2004

Letters to the Editor: Update on "Sunset Park"
February 27th, 2004

Letters to the Editor: Preservation of Cedar Key
February 18th, 2004

Letters to the Editor: What A Year It`s Been!
February 3rd, 2004

Letters to the Editor: A Howling Good Time
January 26th, 2004

Letters to the Editor: Some Thoughts
January 17th, 2004

Letters to the Editor: Hero of Sturgis Circle
January 7th, 2004

Letters to the Editor: Clarification for the Record
December 12th, 2003

More

Another View of the Pulp Mill Pipeline

Another View of the Pulp Mill Pipeline

Letters to the Editor

November 14, 2005

Cedar Key News

Dear Editor:

Howard Drew from Buckeye Technologies has argued that their plan for improving Fenholloway water quality will be benefical to the coastal ocean environment, by reducing pollutants (especially water color and nutrients) that have historically caused problems like seagrass dieoffs off the Fenholloway mouth. Part of that plan is a pipeline that would carry their effluent to the Fenholloway estuary, bypassing about 23 miles of the river. Concern has been raised that by dumping into the estuary rather than into the river upstream, the polluted water might reach the ocean in greater amounts or higher concentrations.

Mr. Drew is right in his claim that the main pollutants of concern to us here in Cedar Key (color, nutrients) will not be increased through transport of them by pipeline rather than the Fenholloway River channel. Those pollutants are not significantly reduced or permanently stored by being passed along such a short river, so it really does not matter to amounts reaching the estuary whether those amounts get there through a pipeline or a river channel. It is Buckeye's treatment improvements at source that will make the difference, not how the remaining pollution gets moved to the ocean. A few things like biochemical oxygen demand may be a bit higher in the estuary than they would if there were no pipeline, but those things are not ones that should directly concern people here.

Cleaning up the Fenholloway could create some great riverfront land development opportunities for Buckeye, and you might wonder whether a polluter ought to be allowed to benefit that way from investments in cleanup, but we really do not have good grounds for complaining that they are going to make matters worse in the coastal environment.

Carl Walters

Professor of Fisheries

University of British Columbia

(and Cedar Key winter resident

Click for printer friendly version

Email this article to a friend

 

 

© 2013
Cedar Key News

cedarkeynews@gmail.com